Exploring Ethical Frameworks and Core Issues in Islamic Philosophy

Introduction: Understanding Islamic Ethical Discourse

Before delving into specific ethical issues, it is crucial to understand the foundational frameworks through which Muslim thinkers have approached ethics. Majid Fakhry's influential typology divides Islamic ethical thought into two primary streams: theological ethics and philosophical ethics.

1. Theological Ethics: This stream primarily derives moral principles from divine revelation (Qur'an and Sunnah) and theological reasoning. Fakhry identifies three major sub-traditions within this category:
   • (a) Rationalist (Qadariyyah/Mu'tazilah): Emphasized human free will (قدر) and the independent capacity of reason to discern good and evil, even without revelation. Moral obligations are inherent in acts themselves.
   • (b) Semi-Rationalist/Voluntarist (Ash'arism): Founded by Abu Hasan al-Ash'ari, this dominant school prioritizes divine command. While reason (عقل) plays a role in understanding revelation and its benefits, the ultimate source of moral value is God's will. Good is what God commands; evil is what God forbids. Adherents include influential figures like al-Baqillani, al-Baghdadi, al-Juwayni, al-Ghazali, and Fakhr al-Din al-Razi.
   • (c) Literalist/Anti-Rationalist (ظاهري): Insists on the absolute primacy of the revealed texts (نقل), interpreted strictly according to their apparent (ظاهر) meaning, rejecting extensive rational speculation or analogy (قياس) in deriving law and ethics. Key proponents include Ibn Hazm and Ibn Taymiyyah.
2. Philosophical Ethics: This tradition engaged deeply with Greek philosophy (particularly Plato, Aristotle, Neoplatonism, Stoicism), seeking to establish ethics on rational and often metaphysical foundations alongside revelation.
   • Early figures like Al-Kindi (Alkindus) and Al-Razi (Rhazes) reflected strong influences from Platonic, Socratic (via Cynic/Stoic interpretations), and Galenic thought.
   • Philosophers such as al-Farabi (Alpharabius), Ibn Sina (Avicenna), and the Christian Aristotelian Yahya ibn ‘Adi exhibited pronounced Platonism and began integrating a significant political dimension into ethical discourse.
   • Ibn Miskawayh synthesized elements from Plato, Aristotle, Neoplatonism, and Stoicism (possibly influenced by Porphyry's commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics via Arabic sources) into a cohesive ethical system, albeit with a reduced political focus compared to al-Farabi.
   • The political-ethical nexus was fully restored and elaborated by Nasir al-Din al-Tusi, who emphasized the organic unity between individual virtue and the governance of the polity.

Having outlined these foundational approaches, we now examine key ethical issues central to Islamic philosophical discourse: the nature of the Soul (نفس), the formation of Character and Behavior (أخلاق), and the concepts of Good (خير) and Evil (شر).

I. The Soul (نفس) as the Foundation of Ethics

The nature, faculties, and cultivation of the human soul (نفس) constitute a primary concern for Muslim ethicists, from the classical (al-Kindi) to modern (Murtadha Mutahhari) periods. While acknowledging the soul as ultimately a divine mystery (سر الله), accessible only partially through revelation, philosophers sought to understand its structure and potential to provide a basis for ethical development. There is considerable debate regarding terminology (soul vs. spirit/rūḥ, its relation to life, ambition, and intellect), but consensus exists that ethical inquiry must begin with self-knowledge (معرفة النفس).

The soul is understood as the divine spark within humanity, the source of consciousness, moral agency, and the link to the transcendent. It is the wellspring of diverse knowledge, yet its ultimate essence remains elusive. Ethical study focuses on recognizing the soul's potential (قوى) to cultivate virtuous states (أحوال) that manifest as righteous actions (أعمال), aligning the individual with their higher spiritual nature (فطرة).

Philosophers widely agree that ethical behavior originates from the soul's condition. Virtuous actions stem from a sound, well-ordered soul (نفس سليمة), while vice arises from a soul in a state of imbalance or corruption (نفس أمارة بالسوء). Understanding the soul's faculties is thus paramount.

Al-Kindi (Alkindus)

Identified three primary powers (قوى) within the soul:

• Appetitive/Desiderative (قوة الشهوة): Centered in the stomach/lower abdomen, governing desires for nourishment, reproduction, and sensual pleasures.
• Irascible/Spirited (قوة الغضب): Centered in the heart/chest, governing courage, anger, ambition, and the drive for dominance or honor.
• Rational (قوة العقل): Centered in the head/brain, governing intellect, discernment, and knowledge. Ethical perfection (كمال) involves the rational faculty governing and harmonizing the other two powers.

Ibn Sina (Avicenna)

In works like Risāla fī al-Quwā al-Nafsāniyyah (Treatise on the Powers of the Soul), he provided a comprehensive philosophical psychology:

• Physical Aspect: Classified souls hierarchically (Vegetative, Animal, Rational/Human), discussed senses, and the distribution of faculties.
• Metaphysical Aspect: Explored the soul's immaterial nature (جوهر روحاني), its relationship with the body (جسم), and its immortality (بقاء النفس).

Al-Ghazali

Emphasized the soul's malleability and the role of habituation (عادة) in ethical formation. He argued that the soul (قلب, heart) can be trained and disciplined. Repeated actions shape inner states (أحوال), which then spontaneously generate corresponding behavior (أخلاق). Forcing oneself towards good deeds eventually transforms the soul, making virtue effortless.

Ibn Miskawayh

In his seminal Tahdhīb al-Akhlāq (Refinement of Character), he rigorously argued the soul is an immaterial substance (جوهر) distinct from the body and its accidents (أعراض). Its nobility increases with detachment from physical limitations. He elaborated the tripartite model:

• Rational Faculty (القوة الناطقة): The "royal" faculty (brain), seeking wisdom and truth.
• Irascible Faculty (القوة الغضبية): The "beastly" faculty (liver/heart), governing courage and anger.
• Appetitive Faculty (القوة الشهوانية): The "animal" faculty (heart/lower regions), governing desires. Ethical health (عدالة) requires the rational faculty to justly govern the other two, establishing harmony within the soul.

II. Character (أخلاق) and Human Behavior

Ethics fundamentally concerns the development of virtuous character (أخلاق حميدة) and the resulting behavior. Muslim thinkers analyzed how character is formed, classified actions, and defined moral excellence.

Al-Ghazali

His ethical theory, central to Iḥyā’ ‘Ulūm al-Dīn (The Revival of the Religious Sciences) and Mīzān al-‘Amal (The Balance of Action), defines character (خلق) as a firmly established state (ملكة) within the soul from which actions proceed easily and spontaneously, without need for deliberation. Good character produces beautiful and praiseworthy actions; bad character produces blameworthy actions. He posited an innate human disposition (فطرة) inclined towards good, but emphasized that character is predominantly shaped by habituation (عادة). Virtue (فضيلة) manifests as the balanced (اعتدال) and proper direction (استقامة) of the three soul faculties: reason (عقل), desire (شهوة), and anger (غضب).

Morteza Motahhari

Offered a hierarchical classification of human actions based on their relation to human potential:

1. Moral Actions (أخلاقي): Transcend animal instincts, reflecting uniquely human capacities for self-sacrifice, justice, and spiritual pursuit.
2. Immoral Actions (لا أخلاقي): Operate purely at the level of animal instincts (e.g., unrestrained aggression, selfish consumption).
3. Anti-Moral Actions (ضد الأخلاق): Fall below the animal level, involving cruelty, degradation, or self-destruction that violates even natural instinct. Motahhari warned that reducing oneself to an animalistic self-conception is immoral, while succumbing to pathologies leading to anti-moral acts represents a profound corruption of humanity (إنسانية). Injustice (ظلم), tyranny (استبداد), and greed (حرص) corrode morality and can lead to this descent.

Ibn Bajja (Avempace)

Distinguished actions based on their motivational source (داعي), not merely the act itself:

• Animal Actions (فعل الحيوان): Driven by instinct (غريزة), immediate reaction, or base desire (e.g., lashing out in anger when hurt).
• Human Actions (فعل الإنسان): Arise from deliberate rational judgment (رأي) and a will (إرادة) oriented towards justice (عدل) or universal benefit, independent of personal instinctual impulse. He argued that achieving true humanity requires consciously activating the rational will to govern the animal self. Only actions stemming purely from reason and justice deserve full moral approbation and signify the "regimen of the solitary" (تدبير المتوحد).

III. Conceptualizing Good (خير) and Evil (شر)

Defining the nature of good and evil, their sources, and their relationship to divine will and human action is a central and complex ethical issue, revealing significant philosophical diversity.

Ibn 'Arabi

Employed a framework influenced by Zoroastrian-derived imagery of Light (نور) and Darkness (ظلمة), viewing them as positive existence and negative non-existence respectively. He argued that what is commonly perceived as evil (شر) is relative and subjective, often arising from:

• Specific religious or cultural prohibitions.
• Conflict with adopted ethical standards.
• Opposition to individual temperament or desire.
• Failure to satisfy natural, moral, or intellectual needs.
• The presence of deficiency (نقص) or incompleteness.

Ibn 'Arabi categorized specific evils like ignorance (جهل), falsehood (كذب), discord (خلاف), tyranny (جور), and ugliness (قبح), all rooted in deficiency. Crucially, he posited that all things, in their ultimate reality within God's creation, possess goodness. Perceived evil stems from a limited perspective (جهل) that fails to grasp the hidden wisdom (حكمة) or divine purpose within an event or circumstance. He used the analogy of bitter medicine: the patient judges it "bad" due to immediate discomfort, unaware of its internal curative purpose. Thus, evil is subjective (اعتباري); only Pure Being (الوجود المحض), identified with God, is absolutely good.

Ibn Miskawayh

Provided a more pragmatic, virtue-ethics centered definition. Good (الخير) is that which humans attain through the exertion of will (إرادة) and effort (جهد) aligned with the purpose of human creation (غرض الإنسان). Evil (الشر) constitutes obstacles (موانع) hindering the attainment of good, manifested either as misdirected will/effort or as laziness (كسل) and aversion (إعراض) to pursuing the good. He identified five cardinal virtues (الفضائل الأمهات):

1. Wisdom (حكمة): Excellence of the rational faculty.
2. Temperance/Moderation (عفة): Excellence of the appetitive faculty.
3. Courage (شجاعة): Excellence of the irascible faculty.
4. Generosity/Liberality (سخاء): Related to the balanced use of external goods.
5. Justice (عدالة): The harmonious balance (اعتدال) between all faculties and virtues.

Their corresponding vices are folly (سفه), profligacy/greed (شراهة/بخل), cowardice/recklessness (جبن/تهور), and injustice/tyranny (جور/ظلم). Miskawayh also categorizes humans based on moral potential:

1. The Inherently Virtuous: A small group (like Prophets and Saints) naturally inclined towards good, resistant to vice.
2. The Incorrigibly Vicious: The majority, strongly inclined towards vice and resistant to reform.
3. The Mutable: Those whose character can be shaped significantly by education (تربية), environment (محیط), and effort towards either good or evil. Miskawayh's ethical project primarily targets this third group.

Conclusion: Synthesizing Islamic Ethical Perspectives

The exploration of ethical issues within Islamic thought reveals a rich and multifaceted tradition. While diverse in their methodologies—ranging from strict theological voluntarism (Ash'arism) to rationalist philosophy influenced by Greek thought—Muslim thinkers converge on several key points concerning the core issues discussed.

1. Primacy of the Soul: There is broad consensus that ethical understanding and cultivation must begin with knowledge of the soul (معرفة النفس). The soul, as the seat of consciousness, moral agency, and the divine spark, possesses distinct faculties whose proper ordering and governance are essential for virtue. The tripartite model (rational, irascible, appetitive) and the necessity of the rational faculty governing the others to achieve balance (اعتدال) and justice (عدالة) within the soul is a recurring theme from al-Kindi and Ibn Miskawayh to al-Ghazali.
2. Character as Habitual State: Ethical behavior stems from ingrained character traits (ملکات/أخلاق), understood as stable dispositions within the soul that generate actions spontaneously. Virtuous character is cultivated primarily through conscious habituation (عادة) and disciplined practice, gradually transforming the inner state until good actions flow naturally. This process involves training the soul's faculties, particularly emphasized by al-Ghazali and integral to Ibn Miskawayh's concept of refinement (تهذيب).
3. The Pursuit of Good and Nature of Evil: Definitions vary, but core concepts emerge. Good (خير) is often linked to the fulfillment of human potential and purpose, achieved through rational will and effort aligned with the soul's higher nature (Ibn Miskawayh) or seen as inherent in existence itself (Ibn 'Arabi). Evil (شر) is frequently understood as a deficiency (نقص), an obstacle to attaining good (Ibn Miskawayh), or a subjective misperception arising from limited human understanding of divine wisdom (Ibn 'Arabi). The Ash'ari theological view grounds both good and evil ultimately in Divine Command, while the Mu'tazili rationalist view seeks objective ethical values discernible by reason.
4. Moral Agency and Classification: Human actions are analyzed based on their source (instinct vs. rational will - Ibn Bajja) and their relationship to human potential (animal, human, sub-animal - Motahhari). The possibility of moral development, central to figures like al-Ghazali and Ibn Miskawayh, assumes human agency and the capacity for transformation, particularly for the "mutable" majority.

The enduring engagement of Muslim philosophers and theologians with the nature of the soul, the formation of character, and the concepts of good and evil underscores the centrality of ethics within the Islamic intellectual tradition. Their diverse explorations provide profound resources for understanding human moral potential and the path towards individual and societal flourishing.

Endnotes

1. Majid Fakhry, Ethical Theories in Islam (Leiden: Brill, 1994), Chapter 1. [Fakhry's typology framework]
2. Ibid., pp. 12-25. [Details on Qadariyyah/Mu'tazilah, Ash'arism, Ẓāhirīs]
3. Fakhry, Ethical Theories, pp. 26-50; Seyyed Hossein Nasr, An Introduction to Islamic Cosmological Doctrines (Albany: SUNY Press, 1993), Chap. 11-13. [Early Philosophers: Al-Kindi, Al-Razi, Al-Farabi, Ibn Sina]
4. Fakhry, Ethical Theories, pp. 76-100; Mohammed Arkoun, Contribution à l'étude de l'humanisme arabe au IVe/Xe siècle: Miskawayh (320/325-421) (932/936-1030) philosophe et historien (Paris: Vrin, 1970). [Ibn Miskawayh's synthesis]
5. Fakhry, Ethical Theories, pp. 101-120; Nasir al-Din al-Tusi, The Nasirean Ethics (trans. G.M. Wickens) (London: Allen & Unwin, 1964). [Al-Tusi's political ethics]
6. Qur'an 17:85. [Soul as divine secret]
7. Al-Kindi, Rasā'il al-Kindī al-falsafiyya (ed. M. A. H. Abū Rīdah) (Cairo, 1950-1953), Vol. 1, pp. 260-261. [Al-Kindi's tripartite soul]
8. Ibn Sina (Avicenna), Avicenna's De Anima (Arabic Text): Being the Psychological Part of Kitāb al-Shifā’ (ed. F. Rahman) (London: OUP, 1959), Book I, Chaps. 1, 5; Book II. [Ibn Sina's psychology]
9. Abu Hamid al-Ghazali, Iḥyā’ ‘Ulūm al-Dīn (numerous editions), Book 21: "Kitāb Sharḥ ‘Ajā’ib al-Qalb" (Book of the Explanation of the Wonders of the Heart). [Al-Ghazali on soul training & habituation]
10. Ibn Miskawayh, Tahdhīb al-Akhlāq (ed. C. Zurayk) (Beirut: AUB, 1966), pp. 7-15, 25-30. [Miskawayh on soul's nature, faculties, governance]
11. Al-Ghazali, Iḥyā’, Book 22: "Kitāb Riyāḍat al-Nafs wa Tahdhīb al-Akhlāq wa Mu‘ālaḫat Amrāḍ al-Qalb" (Book of Disciplining the Soul and Refining Character and Treating the Diseases of the Heart); Al-Ghazali, Mīzān al-‘Amal (ed. S. Dunyā) (Cairo, 1964). [Al-Ghazali's definition of character/morals]
12. Morteza Motahhari, Fundamentals of Islamic Thought: God, Man, and the Universe (trans. R. Campbell) (Berkeley: Mizan Press, 1985), pp. 89-105. [Motahhari's action classification]
13. Ibn Bajja (Avempace), Tadbīr al-Mutawaḥḥid (The Regimen of the Solitary) (ed. M. Fakhry) (Beirut: Dar al-Nahar, 1968). [Ibn Bajja on animal vs. human action]
14. Ibn 'Arabi, Al-Futūḥāt al-Makkiyya (numerous editions), relevant chapters on Good and Evil; William C. Chittick, The Sufi Path of Knowledge: Ibn al-'Arabi's Metaphysics of Imagination (Albany: SUNY Press, 1989), Chap. 10. [Ibn 'Arabi on Good/Evil, Light/Darkness, subjectivity]
15. Ibn Miskawayh, Tahdhīb al-Akhlāq, pp. 15-25, 30-40. [Miskawayh on Good/Evil as attainment/obstacle, cardinal virtues, human categories]

Bagikan Artikel ini